IQ Metrics
IIF Certified Assessment Start IQ Test
IIF Certified Assessment

Who writes this site

The IQ Metrics Editorial Team

Five people write and check what you read here — the test explainers, the news desk, the celebrity profiles, and every number that appears in them. This page says who covers what, who signs a page off before it is published, and how to tell us when we have got something wrong.

Editorial standards

What we hold ourselves to

An IQ score is an easy thing to write about badly. These four rules decide what gets published on IQ Metrics and what gets sent back.

Every number has a source

A figure either traces to a named study, dataset or primary report, or it is labelled an estimate in the sentence that carries it. Where a widely repeated number has no verifiable origin — most published celebrity IQs are exactly this — we say so instead of repeating it as fact.

Nothing here is diagnostic

IQ Metrics runs a self-administered online assessment. It is not a clinical instrument, it diagnoses nothing, and it is not validated for admissions or hiring. Any page that starts to read like a diagnosis gets rewritten. The limits are set out on the FAQ and in IQ Test Accuracy.

A person reviews it, and we name them

Nothing that reports a score, a percentile or a research finding is published on the strength of one person’s draft. It is reviewed before it goes live and the reviewer’s name is printed on the page — so if a claim is wrong, you know who to hold to it.

Corrections are dated, not silent

When we get something wrong we fix it and say what changed, with the date, at the foot of the piece. Quietly editing a page and moving on is how a site loses the right to be believed on the next thing it publishes.

The team

Who writes what

Every section has someone who signs it. The byline on each piece links here, to whoever wrote it.

Aarav Vardhan, Editor-in-Chief at IQ Metrics

Aarav Vardhan

Editor-in-Chief

Aarav decides what IQ Metrics publishes and what it does not. He owns the language the site uses about scores — that results are reported on a mean of 100 with a standard deviation of 15, that a score is a band rather than a point, and that one sitting is an indication rather than a verdict. Where a draft drifts towards implying more precision than the instrument has, it goes back to the writer.

He is the standing reviewer on anything that interprets a number for a reader: the eight test format pages, the score and percentile explainers, and the FAQ. He also holds the line the site does not cross — that this is an educational assessment and not a clinical one — and he is the named contact for corrections.

Covers
Editorial standards, score interpretation, test format pages, sign-off on everything
Reviews
Every page that reports a score, a percentile or a research finding
Writes for
Leon Falkner, Data and Research Analyst at IQ Metrics

Leon Falkner

Data & Research Analyst

Leon writes the blog and the Celebrity IQ profiles, and he owns the arithmetic underneath both. The percentile tables, the bell curve, the conversions between the standard scale and the Stanford–Binet and Cattell scales in the score converter, and every calculator on the IQ Tools page are his to get right and to keep right.

Both writing beats land with him for the same reason. The blog’s hardest pieces are the ones where the statistics do the work — what a percentile actually is, why a score is a band rather than a point, why an unusually high first result drifts back towards the average on a second sitting. And on the Celebrity IQ profiles he takes the figures: almost every famous IQ number in circulation is an estimate, a childhood test score, or a value copied between websites until it looked like a fact, and saying which is which is arithmetic and provenance before it is writing. Elora Mercer researches the people; the numbers attached to them are his.

He also checks the figures in everyone else’s drafts, which is where most errors on a site like this one would otherwise get through: a percentile quoted against the wrong standard deviation, a national average presented without the sampling caveats that make it comparable, a rarity figure that has quietly dropped a decimal place.

Covers
The blog, the Celebrity IQ profiles, and every figure published on the site
Reviewed by
Aarav Vardhan
Writes for
Elora Mercer, Celebrity Research Writer at IQ Metrics

Elora Mercer

Celebrity Research Writer

Elora researches and writes the Celebrity IQ profiles. Her half of that section is the person rather than the number: what is actually documented about someone, which claims about them trace back to a source, and which have simply been repeated between websites until they started to look like facts. Where the record is thin, the profile says so instead of filling the gap.

She also runs the news desk — new studies on intelligence and cognition, changes in how testing is used in schools and workplaces, and the recurring claims about IQ that surface in the press and deserve a straight answer. Each story is written from the paper or the primary announcement, not from somebody else’s coverage of it.

The discipline that matters on both beats is the same: restraint. A single study is a single study — sample size, whether it has replicated, and what the authors themselves declined to claim all belong in the piece. Where a headline elsewhere has outrun the finding it is built on, saying so plainly is usually the story.

Covers
The Celebrity IQ profiles, and the news desk — new research, testing policy, and claims about IQ in the press
Reviewed by
Aarav Vardhan · figures checked by Leon Falkner
Writes for
Alden Cross, Intelligence Research Writer at IQ Metrics

Alden Cross

Intelligence Research Writer

Alden writes long-form explainers for the blog — the pieces that have to take a genuinely difficult idea and leave the reader holding it correctly. What the four reasoning domains actually measure. Why a percentile is more useful than a score. Why an unusually high first result tends to drift back towards the average on a second sitting, which is regression to the mean and not a sign that anything has gone wrong.

His working rule is that the caveat belongs in the same paragraph as the claim, not in a disclaimer at the bottom that nobody reads. He works from the psychometric literature rather than from other websites, and where the research is contested he says it is contested instead of picking the tidier answer.

Covers
Cognitive domains, scoring and percentiles, the limits of testing, culture-fair assessment
Reviewed by
Aarav Vardhan
Writes for
Arjun Vardhan, News and Research Writer at IQ Metrics

Arjun Vardhan

News & Research Writer

Arjun writes study write-ups for the news desk — the pieces that take a newly published paper and set out what it actually found, who it studied, and how far the finding travels beyond the sample it came from.

He also covers how intelligence testing is used in practice: what schools and employers do with a score, where that use is supported by the evidence and where it has run ahead of it.

Covers
Study write-ups, research reporting, testing in schools and workplaces
Reviewed by
Aarav Vardhan · figures checked by Leon Falkner
Writes for
Process

What happens before a page goes live

The same five steps for a blog explainer, a news story and a celebrity profile.

Commissioned

A topic goes to the person who covers that area, with the question the piece has to answer stated up front.

Written from sources

Drafted from the study, dataset or primary record — not from other sites covering it. Anything unverifiable is labelled an estimate.

Figures checked

Every score, percentile, scale and statistic is checked independently against its source before the draft moves on.

Editorial review

Read for accuracy and for overreach — particularly any sentence implying more certainty than the measurement supports.

Published and dated

Goes live with the writer’s byline, the reviewer’s name and the date. Later corrections are added at the foot of the page, dated.

Think we’ve got something wrong?

Tell us and we will check it. If a figure, a source or a claim on this site is wrong, the page gets corrected and the correction is noted at the foot of it with the date. Email support@iqmetrics.org with the page and what you believe is incorrect — a link to the source you are working from makes it considerably faster.

Contact us

Ready to find out
where you stand?

Take the certified assessment now — your IQ score, percentile, printable certificate and full performance report, delivered the moment you submit.

Find your IQ score now!

No signup to start · Instant results · 10–30 minutes