IIF Certified Assessment
Start IQ Test
IIF Certified Assessment
No aggregator assigns Doctor Faustus a number — this is not the usual case of an inflated figure to correct. He is here because he is literature’s most direct dramatisation of a mind that exhausts every field of knowledge and still makes a catastrophic choice.
A character can be written to know everything and still be a fool about the one decision that matters — the whole play turns on that gap. A fictional estimate describes the writing, not a mind, which is why we can publish one freely.
Set the claim aside for a moment. If someone genuinely scored in this range, here is what that would represent.
Average is 100 by construction, and about two-thirds of people fall between 85 and 115. Take the test to place your own score on this scale.
| Score range | Classification | Share of people | What it indicates |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85 – 114 | Average | ~68% | The range most people fall into. |
| 115 – 129 | Above average | ~13.6% | Roughly one person in seven. |
| 130 – 144 | Gifted | ~2% | The threshold most high-IQ societies use. |
| Above 144 | Highly gifted | ~0.1% | Figures above this range are extrapolated from the curve rather than measured. |
Percentages are approximate and describe a normal distribution. The same number means different things on tests with different standard deviations.
Thirty questions gives you a measured position on this exact scale — your score, your percentile and the ability breakdown behind it.
Find out in 30 minutes →The historical Johann Georg Faust was educated at Heidelberg and spent his career moving between German towns as an itinerant astrologer and alchemist, acquiring a reputation for fraud that outlived him. His death, around 1540–41, was reinterpreted within a generation as a bargain with the devil come due.
Christopher Marlowe’s The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus, first performed around 1592 and published in 1604, is the version that fixed the character in English literature: a Wittenberg scholar who has exhausted logic, medicine, law and divinity, and turns to necromancy for what conventional learning could not give him.
Goethe’s Faust, published in two parts in 1808 and 1832, retold the legend for a different age, and gave the language the phrase “Faustian bargain” — a trade of long-term ruin for immediate power or knowledge, still in everyday use as a byword for exactly the gap this page describes.
By Elora Mercer, Celebrity Research WriterFigures checked by Leon Falkner, Data & Research AnalystThe estimate above rests on this record. Every entry here is a matter of public fact, which is more than can be said for the number itself.
Following a claim back to its first appearance is the part almost nobody does — and it is what most people are actually asking.
Faustus is the one profile on this site built on a real historical person who then became a legend rather than staying a biography. Johann Georg Faust was a real German alchemist and astrologer, c. 1480 – c. 1541, with a documented reputation as a conman as much as a scholar; he reportedly died in an alchemical accident, a death his clerical enemies mythologised as the devil collecting him in person.
The legend was fixed in print within a generation — the anonymous 1587 chapbook Historia von D. Johann Fausten — and dramatised by Marlowe around 1592 and by Goethe in 1808. Every later version keeps the same shape: a scholar of real, encyclopaedic learning who finds it insufficient.
He is included here for the same reason Sherlock Holmes is: fictional “genius” characters attract genuine cultural interest, and estimating one misrepresents nobody, since nobody real is being described. Faustus is the clearest case in this section of the site’s wider argument in miniature — vast documented learning is not the same thing as good judgement, and the play’s tragedy is built entirely on that gap.
How we read a number →The opening monologue, in which Faustus reviews and rejects logic, medicine, law and divinity in turn, is the direct textual basis for the estimate above.
The chapbook that first fixed the legend in print, drawing on the reputation of the historical Johann Georg Faust.
A German alchemist and astrologer with a documented reputation for fraud; the primary record is thin and mostly hostile, which is itself part of how the legend formed.
Checked directly; unlike Sherlock Holmes, no aggregator or “smartest fictional characters” list assigns this character a specific number.
The figures that circulate for Doctor Faustus, what we were able to confirm, and where the two diverge.
No listicle or aggregator assigns this character a specific figure, unlike Sherlock Holmes. Worth separating clearly from Johann Fennhoff, a 1960s Marvel Comics supervillain who also uses the name “Doctor Faustus” — an unrelated, copyrighted, and much more recent character with no connection to the Renaissance legend profiled here.
We searched specifically for a circulating IQ figure attached to this character and found none. Every version of the legend — the 1587 German chapbook, Marlowe’s c.1592 play and Goethe’s 1808 telling — predates the concept of intelligence testing by more than three centuries.
There is nothing to report here. Unlike the site’s other fictional profiles, nobody has attached a specific number to this character at all — which is itself worth stating rather than manufacturing a claim to audit.
Want a number that does hold up? Every figure on this page is somebody’s claim. Take the 30-question test and get a percentile you can check rather than a figure you have to trust.
No figure circulates for this character. He is fictional and, in every version of the legend, predates the concept of intelligence testing by centuries.
Yes — Johann Georg Faust, a German alchemist and astrologer who lived roughly 1480 to 1541 and had a contemporary reputation as a fraud.
Because the site’s wider argument — that documented achievement and raw cognitive claims are not the same thing — has no clearer fictional example. Faustus is written to have mastered every field of scholarship, and it does not save him.
No. Marvel’s Johann Fennhoff, introduced decades later, borrows the name only. This page covers the Renaissance legend and its literary versions by Marlowe and Goethe.
Mainly Christopher Marlowe’s c.1592 play, the first major English dramatisation, with background from the 1587 German chapbook that originated the legend and Goethe’s 1808 retelling.
A trade of long-term ruin for immediate power or knowledge — the phrase comes directly from Goethe’s version of this story and is still in everyday use.
You can find out in about fifteen minutes. The IQ Metrics assessment is 30 questions, scored on the same 100-mean scale used throughout this page, so your result and the estimate above are at least expressed in the same units — one measured, one inferred. Once you have a number, the leaderboard shows where it would sit, and how we score and norm it explains the benchmarking.
From the documented record rather than a test — the method is named above and set out in full under how we read a number. Compare it against the other fictional profiles, starting with Sherlock Holmes.
Portrait © Matthew Yohe, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait © Debbie Rowe / The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait by Christopher Smith, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — a work of the U.S. federal government, public domain. Background removed for the portrait above.
Thirty questions, scored against general-population benchmarks. Your score, your percentile, your ability breakdown and a printable IIF certificate.
Find your IQ score now! →The assessment costs nothing and you always get a real result. Upgrades add precision, analysis and a certificate — never access to the test itself.
Whatever you paid comes off the next tier for 30 days. Start small without losing the money.
Not what you expected? Full refund, no questions, no form to hunt for.
Prices adjust to your country automatically, so the certificate is reachable outside high-income markets.
Coming later: an annual membership (~$89/year) for unlimited retests, practice sets and progress tracking. Monthly billing is deliberately not offered — a once-a-year assessment does not justify a monthly charge, and it would churn.
.jpg){kind=link}
