
Obama has one of the most checkable records of anyone in this section. The numbers attached to him were not derived from it, which is why they move depending on who is quoting them.
Selective academic achievement is a decent but noisy proxy: it reflects work, coaching and circumstance alongside ability. There is no test result of any kind behind this range.
Set the claim aside for a moment. If someone genuinely scored in this range, here is what that would represent.
Average is 100 by construction, and about two-thirds of people fall between 85 and 115. Take the test to place your own score on this scale.
| Score range | Classification | Share of people | What it indicates |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85 – 114 | Average | ~68% | The range most people fall into. |
| 115 – 129 | Above average | ~13.6% | Roughly one person in seven. |
| 130 – 144 | Gifted | ~2% | The threshold most high-IQ societies use. |
| Above 144 | Highly gifted | ~0.1% | Figures above this range are extrapolated from the curve rather than measured. |
Percentages are approximate and describe a normal distribution. The same number means different things on tests with different standard deviations.
Thirty questions gives you a measured position on this exact scale — your score, your percentile and the ability breakdown behind it.
Find out in 30 minutes →Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Honolulu in 1961. He attended Occidental College, transferred to Columbia University and graduated in 1983 in political science, then worked as a community organiser in Chicago before entering Harvard Law School in 1988.
He was elected president of the Harvard Law Review in his second year and graduated magna cum laude in 1991. He taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago from 1992 to 2004 while serving in the Illinois State Senate from 1997.
He was elected to the US Senate in 2004 and to the presidency in 2008, serving two terms from 2009 to 2017. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 and has written three books, two of them before entering national office.
The estimate above rests on this record. Every entry here is a matter of public fact, which is more than can be said for the number itself.
Following a claim back to its first appearance is the part almost nobody does — and it is what most people are actually asking.
Presidential IQ figures are the most thoroughly documented fabrications in this section, which is why this category exists at all. In July 2001 an email began circulating attributing an IQ ranking of recent presidents to the “Lovenstein Institute” of Scranton, Pennsylvania. No such institute exists, and none of the researchers quoted in it exist either. The numbers were invented as a joke on a humour website.
It reached The Guardian on 19 July 2001 and Garry Trudeau’s Doonesbury on 26 August. Both published retractions. At least four newspapers reported it as fact. That episode predates Obama’s presidency — he is not in it — but it established the template every later list has followed: a plausible institutional name, a tidy ranking, and no methodology at all.
What makes Obama an unusually good test of the genre is that a real record exists and is easy to check. The Harvard Law Review presidency in 1990 was an election by the editors themselves after a long selection process, and it was widely reported at the time. The magna cum laude is on his degree. Anyone constructing an estimate had this material available and did not use it, which tells you the figures were not constructed from evidence.
Compare John F. Kennedy, where a documented school result of 119 exists and was displaced by larger invented numbers, and Donald Trump, where the circulating figures are similarly unsourced. In this category the direction of the error tracks the politics of the person quoting it, which is the clearest possible sign that no measurement is involved.
How we read a number →Reported contemporaneously in the national press. An externally judged selection from a large field, and the strongest single item in the record.
The documented academic result the estimate above rests on.
A fabrication. No such institute exists; the numbers originated as a joke. Reported as fact by The Guardian on 19 July 2001 and in Doonesbury on 26 August; both retracted. Documented by Snopes and the Museum of Hoaxes.
No score has been released, claimed or documented for Obama at any point.
Unsourced, mutually inconsistent, and not derived from the documented academic record that was freely available to anyone compiling them.
The figures that circulate for Barack Obama, what we were able to confirm, and where the two diverge.
Figures between 130 and 150 circulate widely, most often around 145, sometimes presented as measured and sometimes as an estimate by an unnamed expert.
No IQ score has ever been released for Obama, and none exists in the public record. The circulating figures come from the same genre of unsourced presidential IQ lists that produced the 2001 Lovenstein hoax, in which a non-existent Pennsylvania institute was credited with ranking presidents and the numbers were simply made up.
A twenty-point spread with no method behind any of it. Where a real record exists but no test does, the invented numbers drift to fit the politics of whoever is quoting them.
Want a number that does hold up? Every figure on this page is somebody’s claim. Take the 30-question test and get a percentile you can check rather than a figure you have to trust.
No test result has ever been released or documented. The figures between 130 and 150 that circulate online have no stated method and no source.
There is no evidence for that or any other specific number. The 145 is one of several figures in circulation, none of which come with a test, a date or an examiner.
A fabricated 2001 report ranking recent US presidents by IQ, attributed to a Pennsylvania institute that does not exist. The Guardian and Doonesbury both reported it as fact and both retracted. It predates Obama but set the template for later lists.
A Columbia BA in political science in 1983, election as president of the Harvard Law Review in 1990, and a Harvard Law JD magna cum laude in 1991. He then taught constitutional law at Chicago for twelve years.
Better than an unsourced number, and still noisy. Selective admissions and honours reflect sustained work and circumstance as well as ability, which is why the range here is fifteen points wide.
Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy — whose documented 119 was displaced by larger inventions — and Donald Trump.
You can find out in about fifteen minutes. The IQ Metrics assessment is 30 questions, scored on the same 100-mean scale used throughout this page, so your result and the estimate above are at least expressed in the same units — one measured, one inferred. Once you have a number, the leaderboard shows where it would sit, and how we score and norm it explains the benchmarking.
From the documented record rather than a test — the method is named above and set out in full under how we read a number. Compare it against the other politics profiles, starting with Thomas Jefferson.
Portrait © Matthew Yohe, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait © Debbie Rowe / The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait by Christopher Smith, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — a work of the U.S. federal government, public domain. Background removed for the portrait above.
Thirty questions, scored against general-population benchmarks. Your score, your percentile, your ability breakdown and a printable IIF certificate.
Find your IQ score now! →The assessment costs nothing and you always get a real result. Upgrades add precision, analysis and a certificate — never access to the test itself.
Whatever you paid comes off the next tier for 30 days. Start small without losing the money.
Not what you expected? Full refund, no questions, no form to hunt for.
Prices adjust to your country automatically, so the certificate is reachable outside high-income markets.
Coming later: an annual membership (~$89/year) for unlimited retests, practice sets and progress tracking. Monthly billing is deliberately not offered — a once-a-year assessment does not justify a monthly charge, and it would churn.