IIF Certified Assessment
Start IQ Test
IIF Certified Assessment
Asimov is the only person in this section who held office in Mensa, said he scored above 160, and wrote a well-known essay explaining why that fact should not impress anybody.
The 160-plus figure comes from Asimov himself, describing army tests. It is self-reported, undated and unverifiable, which is exactly the kind of evidence this site is normally sceptical of — and we treat it that way here. The range above rests on the doctorate and the published record, not on his own account of his scores.
Set the claim aside for a moment. If someone genuinely scored in this range, here is what that would represent.
Average is 100 by construction, and about two-thirds of people fall between 85 and 115. Take the test to place your own score on this scale.
| Score range | Classification | Share of people | What it indicates |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85 – 114 | Average | ~68% | The range most people fall into. |
| 115 – 129 | Above average | ~13.6% | Roughly one person in seven. |
| 130 – 144 | Gifted | ~2% | The threshold most high-IQ societies use. |
| Above 144 | Highly gifted | ~0.1% | Figures above this range are extrapolated from the curve rather than measured. |
Percentages are approximate and describe a normal distribution. The same number means different things on tests with different standard deviations.
Thirty questions gives you a measured position on this exact scale — your score, your percentile and the ability breakdown behind it.
Find out in 30 minutes →Isaac Asimov was born near Smolensk in 1920 and brought to Brooklyn at three. He read the science-fiction magazines in his family’s candy store, entered Columbia at 15, and completed a doctorate in biochemistry there in 1948 after wartime work at the Philadelphia Navy Yard alongside Robert Heinlein.
He joined Boston University’s medical school faculty and kept the professorship for life, though writing overtook teaching by the mid-1950s. He published across every major division of the Dewey system — fiction, chemistry, history, Shakespeare criticism, the Bible — at a rate that remains difficult to credit.
The Robot stories and the Foundation sequence are the work he is remembered for, and the Three Laws of Robotics have outlived their fiction to become shorthand in real engineering ethics. He died in New York in 1992.
The estimate above rests on this record. Every entry here is a matter of public fact, which is more than can be said for the number itself.
Following a claim back to its first appearance is the part almost nobody does — and it is what most people are actually asking.
This page is unusual for the section because the source of the number is not an anonymous list — it is the subject, in print, repeatedly. That makes the provenance clean and the evidence weak at the same time. Self-report is testimony, and Asimov, a professional writer with an interest in his own myth, is not a neutral witness about his own scores.
What raises the page above the usual audit is that he made our argument for us, decades earlier and better. His position was that an IQ test measures a particular kind of academic facility, that the people who write the tests share that facility, and that the resulting score therefore tells you how much a person resembles a test-writer. He was not being modest; he was making a claim about construct validity, and it holds up.
He was also, by his own description, unimpressed by some of his fellow Mensa members — the ones who treated the score as an achievement rather than a measurement. Our 155–170 sits below Voltaire and Goethe in this category, and the reason is methodological rather than personal: their figures come from Cox’s historiometric study, which rates dense childhood records and tends to produce high numbers. Asimov’s rests on a completed doctorate, which is a narrower but firmer thing.
How we read a number →Asimov’s own account of his army test scores and his argument that the tests measure resemblance to their authors. The central document for this page.
Institutional record. He entered Columbia at 15.
Held the title from the 1950s onward, latterly without teaching duties.
A documented office. Asimov wrote about the organisation with some ambivalence.
The 160-plus figure is Asimov’s own recollection of army testing. No score report or administering record has been produced.
The figures that circulate for Isaac Asimov, what we were able to confirm, and where the two diverge.
160 is the standard figure and, unusually, it originates with the subject: Asimov wrote that he consistently scored over 160 on army intelligence tests.
Asimov confirmed the number and then spent an essay taking it apart. In “What Is Intelligence, Anyway?” he described his army scores, then set against them the example of his car mechanic, who could diagnose a fault Asimov could not begin to understand. His conclusion was that the tests were written by academics and rewarded academic aptitude — and that on a test written by his mechanic, he would have failed. It is the most useful thing anyone with a high score has said about high scores.
The higher figures are inflations of Asimov’s own claim. Even the original is self-reported testimony, not a document.
Want a number that does hold up? Every figure on this page is somebody’s claim. Take the 30-question test and get a percentile you can check rather than a figure you have to trust.
He wrote that he consistently scored above 160 on army intelligence tests. That figure is self-reported and has never been independently verified. Our 155–170 range rests on his completed doctorate and published record instead.
Yes — he served as vice-president of Mensa International. He also wrote about the organisation with some ambivalence, describing members who treated their scores as achievements.
In “What Is Intelligence, Anyway?” he argued that IQ tests are written by academics and therefore reward academic aptitude — so a high score mainly tells you how closely a person resembles the people who wrote the test.
Yes, a PhD in biochemistry from Columbia in 1948. He entered Columbia at 15 and was later a professor of biochemistry at Boston University School of Medicine.
No more than any other self-report. It is testimony rather than a document, which is why this site treats Asimov’s own figure as a claim to be examined rather than a result to be quoted.
Because Voltaire and Goethe are rated through Cox’s historiometric method, which reads dense childhood records and produces high figures. Asimov’s range rests on a completed doctorate — narrower evidence, but firmer.
You can find out in about fifteen minutes. The IQ Metrics assessment is 30 questions, scored on the same 100-mean scale used throughout this page, so your result and the estimate above are at least expressed in the same units — one measured, one inferred. Once you have a number, the leaderboard shows where it would sit, and how we score and norm it explains the benchmarking.
From the documented record rather than a test — the method is named above and set out in full under how we read a number. Compare it against the other writers profiles, starting with Voltaire.
Portrait © Matthew Yohe, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait © Debbie Rowe / The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait by Christopher Smith, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — a work of the U.S. federal government, public domain. Background removed for the portrait above.
Thirty questions, scored against general-population benchmarks. Your score, your percentile, your ability breakdown and a printable IIF certificate.
Find your IQ score now! →The assessment costs nothing and you always get a real result. Upgrades add precision, analysis and a certificate — never access to the test itself.
Whatever you paid comes off the next tier for 30 days. Start small without losing the money.
Not what you expected? Full refund, no questions, no form to hunt for.
Prices adjust to your country automatically, so the certificate is reachable outside high-income markets.
Coming later: an annual membership (~$89/year) for unlimited retests, practice sets and progress tracking. Monthly billing is deliberately not offered — a once-a-year assessment does not justify a monthly charge, and it would churn.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
