
210 is the highest estimated IQ in the best-known study of its kind — and Goethe is also the subject whose childhood that study had the most paper to read.
Our range is deliberately well below the 210. Cox’s method converts documented childhood achievement into a score, and Goethe left more documented childhood than any other subject in the study — which inflates the result by construction.
Set the claim aside for a moment. If someone genuinely scored in this range, here is what that would represent.
Average is 100 by construction, and about two-thirds of people fall between 85 and 115. Take the test to place your own score on this scale.
| Score range | Classification | Share of people | What it indicates |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85 – 114 | Average | ~68% | The range most people fall into. |
| 115 – 129 | Above average | ~13.6% | Roughly one person in seven. |
| 130 – 144 | Gifted | ~2% | The threshold most high-IQ societies use. |
| Above 144 | Highly gifted | ~0.1% | Figures above this range are extrapolated from the curve rather than measured. |
Percentages are approximate and describe a normal distribution. The same number means different things on tests with different standard deviations.
Thirty questions gives you a measured position on this exact scale — your score, your percentile and the ability breakdown behind it.
Find out in 30 minutes →Goethe was born in Frankfurt in 1749 into a wealthy household with a large library and private tutors. He was sent to Leipzig to study law, finished at Strasbourg in 1771, and published Werther three years later, which made him a European celebrity before he was twenty-five.
In 1775 he moved to Weimar at the invitation of the young duke and stayed for the rest of his life, serving as a privy councillor with responsibility for mines, roads and the treasury. He treated his scientific work as seriously as his literary work and considered Zur Farbenlehre among his more important achievements, though physics did not agree.
He finished the second part of Faust in 1831, sealed it, and died the following March. It was published after his death, sixty years after he had begun it.
The estimate above rests on this record. Every entry here is a matter of public fact, which is more than can be said for the number itself.
Following a claim back to its first appearance is the part almost nobody does — and it is what most people are actually asking.
This is the single most important entry on the site for understanding where historical IQ numbers come from, because almost all of them come from here. Cox’s 1926 volume is the origin of the estimated scores attached to Voltaire, Mozart and dozens of other pre-modern figures, and Goethe sits at the top of her table.
The method was to gather everything recorded about a subject’s childhood, compare each documented achievement with the age at which an ordinary child reached it, and derive a ratio. It is a serious attempt at a hard problem. It also has an unavoidable flaw: a child about whom nothing was written scores low, whatever they could do.
Goethe wrote an autobiography of his own early years. His family preserved his juvenilia. His correspondence runs to thousands of letters. No other subject in the study offered a fraction of that material, and the score reflects it. The 210 is best read as a measurement of the archive.
How we read a number →The source of the 210. Volume II of Terman’s Genetic Studies of Genius. Cox states the estimates are inferences from biographical record, and discusses the record-quantity bias directly.
His autobiography of his first twenty-six years, and a large part of why the childhood record is so full.
A genuine comparative-anatomy result, and evidence for the breadth the estimate rests on.
Dated institutional record from his twenty-second year.
Goethe died in 1832. The first practical intelligence scale was published by Binet and Simon in 1905.
The figures that circulate for Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, what we were able to confirm, and where the two diverge.
210 is quoted everywhere, usually as “the highest IQ ever recorded”. It is neither the highest nor recorded.
The 210 is real, in the sense that Catharine Cox published it — as an estimate, in a Stanford monograph, with the method stated openly. What is false is the way it travels: as a measurement, without the study attached, and without the caveat Cox herself put on it. She noted that her estimates rose with the quantity of surviving biographical record. Goethe has the fullest such record of anyone she examined.
Cox gives two figures for each subject, and the lower of hers is 185. Popular sources quote only the higher one, which is the usual direction of drift.
Want a number that does hold up? Every figure on this page is somebody’s claim. Take the 30-question test and get a percentile you can check rather than a figure you have to trust.
He was never tested; he died in 1832, more than seventy years before the first practical intelligence scale. The 210 comes from Catharine Cox’s 1926 historiometric study, which estimated scores from biographical records.
No. It is the highest estimate in one 1926 study of three hundred historical figures, and it was never a recorded test result.
Because Cox’s scores rise with the amount of surviving childhood documentation, and Goethe’s is the fullest in the study. Correcting for that bias pulls the figure down.
Around three hundred figures born between 1450 and 1850. Voltaire and Mozart are both profiled on this site from the same source, and most historical IQ numbers online trace back to it.
Yes. He identified the human intermaxillary bone in 1784 and published a theory of colour in 1810. The colour theory was wrong as physics but influential in the study of perception.
Close to sixty years. He began it in his twenties and completed the second part in 1831, the year before his death.
You can find out in about fifteen minutes. The IQ Metrics assessment is 30 questions, scored on the same 100-mean scale used throughout this page, so your result and the estimate above are at least expressed in the same units — one measured, one inferred. Once you have a number, the leaderboard shows where it would sit, and how we score and norm it explains the benchmarking.
From the documented record rather than a test — the method is named above and set out in full under how we read a number. Compare it against the other writers profiles, starting with Voltaire.
Portrait © Matthew Yohe, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait © Debbie Rowe / The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0. The background-removed portrait above is a derivative work and is likewise offered under the same licence. · Portrait by Christopher Smith, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — a work of the U.S. federal government, public domain. Background removed for the portrait above.
Thirty questions, scored against general-population benchmarks. Your score, your percentile, your ability breakdown and a printable IIF certificate.
Find your IQ score now! →The assessment costs nothing and you always get a real result. Upgrades add precision, analysis and a certificate — never access to the test itself.
Whatever you paid comes off the next tier for 30 days. Start small without losing the money.
Not what you expected? Full refund, no questions, no form to hunt for.
Prices adjust to your country automatically, so the certificate is reachable outside high-income markets.
Coming later: an annual membership (~$89/year) for unlimited retests, practice sets and progress tracking. Monthly billing is deliberately not offered — a once-a-year assessment does not justify a monthly charge, and it would churn.