A crow has no IQ. An IQ is a score defined by comparing a person with a norm group of people the same age, and no norm group exists for any bird. What science can say is what crows and ravens do: bend wire into hooks, plan for a need that will only arise hours later, produce a set number of calls on cue, and pass some cause-and-effect puzzles at about the level of a 5-to-7-year-old child. On other puzzles the same crows perform no better than chance. That mixed record is more interesting than any single number.

• No crow IQ exists. IQ needs human norms; any figure attached to a crow or raven in a meme or listicle has no source.
• What is measured instead: tool making, planning ahead, analogical reasoning, counting one’s own calls and remembering human faces, each tested with a task built for the species, usually on a handful of birds.
• The “7-year-old” line traces to a 2014 study of six New Caledonian crows on water-displacement puzzles, compared with children aged 5 to 7 on that task alone.
• Where crows stop: the same birds were at chance on two of the six puzzles.

This article covers why “crow IQ” is not a real number, the landmark experiments and their limits, the true origin of the 7-year-old comparison, how a crow brain compares with a primate brain, whether ravens are smarter than crows, and the other kind of Raven that turns up when you search for “raven IQ”.

Can a crow’s IQ be measured?

Not in the way a person’s can. A modern IQ is a deviation score with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, so a result only means something next to the people of the same age it was normed on (see the IQ bell curve). There is no such reference group for crows, and no test written in words or pictures for humans would be fair to a bird with different senses, motivations and bodies. The same problem applies to dog IQ, where researchers use tasks that fit the species instead.

What comparative psychologists do is give animals a physical task and compare pass rates, trial counts and errors. The result is a profile of what a species can do, with its own caveats about training, motivation and sample size. Some researchers have asked whether animals show a general factor of intelligence like human g. A meta-analysis of 555 correlations between cognitive tasks in animals found a mean of just 0.185 (95% confidence interval 0.087 to 0.287) and described the support for general intelligence as relatively weak. Studies of wild birds point in different directions: New Zealand robins tested on six tasks produced a first component explaining a little over 34% of the variance, below the 40% or so typical of human tests, while Australian magpies on four tasks produced 64.6%, though critics say four tasks are far from comprehensive. As far as we could find, no crow or raven has been tested for a general factor at all.

What do crows and ravens actually do?

These seven results are the ones most often cited, each from a peer-reviewed study. Species matter: crows, ravens and rooks are all corvids, but each finding belongs to the species tested, and the sample sizes are small.

Two cautions apply to every row. First, most of these birds were trained or habituated for the task, and each result has critics who propose leaner explanations, such as trial-and-error learning. Second, a result such as the 2017 raven study is usually described as matching great apes on one kind of planning; it is not evidence of an all-round ape-level mind. Researchers describe the pattern as “divergent brain evolution with convergent mental evolution”, the phrase Nathan Emery and Nicola Clayton used in their 2004 Science review of the field.

Which human IQ skills have a crow equivalent?

A human IQ test samples several skills and combines them into one number. Setting those skills beside the nearest crow evidence shows why no such number exists for a bird: some skills have a rough counterpart, and some have none.

That gap is the reason for the answer at the top of this article. An IQ is a rank among people on a bundle of skills; for a crow, only some of the bundle can be tested, with different tasks in different labs, so the results stay a profile. The same is true of dog IQ and chimpanzee IQ, and verbal versus non-verbal IQ scores shows how uneven the profile can be even in people.

Where does the "as smart as a 7-year-old" claim come from?

It traces to a 2014 paper in PLOS ONE by Sarah Jelbert and colleagues. Six wild-caught New Caledonian crows, pre-trained to drop stones, were given “Aesop’s fable” puzzles, in which objects must be dropped into a tube to raise a floating reward. Across 20 trials per task the birds chose the tube with water over the tube with sand 76.3% of the time, objects that sink over objects that float 88.0%, solid over hollow objects 89.0%, and the tube with the higher water level 86.8%. They did not favour the narrow tube that raises water faster (39.3%), and on the U-tube task, where a hidden connection makes the obvious choice the wrong one, they performed at chance (48.9%). Only four of the six birds completed every task. The authors said the birds’ grasp of causal properties rivalled that of 5-to-7-year-old children on similar tasks. Press coverage later compressed that into “as smart as a 7-year-old”.

A companion study by Lucy Cheke, Elsa Loissel and Nicola Clayton (2012) gave the same tasks to children aged 4 to 10, in five two-minute trials. Most children aged seven and over learned to pass even the counter-intuitive U-tube version, while few younger children did. So the line is a fair summary of one narrow task, and even that is contested: critics note that the crows sometimes dropped non-functional objects early on, and a later meta-analysis argued that Aesop’s fable tasks cannot separate trial-and-error learning from causal reasoning. It is not a statement about general intelligence. A crow that matches a six-year-old at water displacement has not matched one at language, arithmetic or reading. The age-based comparison also mirrors how human testing works, which is what IQ test questions for kids explains.

How does a crow brain compare with a primate brain?

Bird brains are small but densely packed. A 2016 study in PNAS by Seweryn Olkowicz and colleagues counted neurons in 73 birds from 28 species and found that parrot and songbird brains hold about twice as many neurons as primate brains of the same mass. A raven’s 14-gram brain contains about 2.2 billion neurons, more than a billion of them in the pallium, the forebrain region associated with flexible behaviour. That is more than a capuchin monkey has in its pallium, and a blue-and-yellow macaw, with a walnut-sized brain, has more pallial neurons than a rhesus monkey. Two limits are worth stating. The study sampled ravens and rooks but no crow species, so “crows have primate-like neuron counts” goes a step beyond the data. And a raven’s brain, at about 14.5 cubic centimetres, is roughly a twenty-fifth the volume of a chimpanzee’s.

That is why “bird brain” is a poor insult, and why raw brain size is a weak predictor of ability across species. The same caution holds within humans: brain size and IQ correlate only modestly, and popular brain myths about intelligence show how often a tidy claim about brains outruns the evidence.

Do crows have conscious experience?

A 2020 study in Science by Nieder, Wagener and Rinnert recorded single neurons in the pallium, the forebrain region discussed above, of crows performing a visual detection task. The neurons’ responses correlated with what the birds perceived, whether a stimulus was present or not, and not only with the physical stimulus. Activity followed two stages: an early component that mainly reflected stimulus intensity and a later component that predicted the crows’ reports. The authors argue that this is an empirical marker of avian sensory consciousness, and that the neural foundations of it arose either before the emergence of mammals or independently in birds, without needing a layered cerebral cortex (Nieder and colleagues, 2020).

Two cautions apply. It is one laboratory’s finding in a small number of trained birds, and the interpretation is the authors’ own. And it is about perception, not intelligence: it suggests crows have something it is like to see a stimulus, which says nothing about how they would score on any test. The point fits this article’s theme. What crows do, and what their brains do, can be measured; a single number for how smart they are cannot. Brain myths about intelligence covers the same lesson about brain size and ability in people.

Crow vs raven: which is smarter?

Nobody has run one identical test battery on both species and ranked them, so the honest answer is that they are comparable on the tasks that exist. The famous tool-making results come from New Caledonian crows, which use tools routinely in the wild, while the long-range planning results come from ravens. Each species looks best on the task it was given. The physical differences are clearer:

The raven is the largest songbird in the world, and it has the bigger brain. That does not make it the cleverer bird on any given test, only the larger one.

Are crows smarter than dogs, chimpanzees or children?

There is no single fair answer, because the skills differ. Dogs are exceptional at following human pointing and gestures, a skill shaped by thousands of years of domestication; crows are exceptional at making and adapting tools, which dogs are not known to do. No head-to-head test of the two exists, and the dog IQ article covers the dog side.

Corvids have been compared with apes on published ape data rather than in the same room. In a self-control task in which an animal must resist reaching straight for visible food, ravens scored 100% (five birds), jackdaws 97% and New Caledonian crows 92%, against 100% for chimpanzees, 99.1% for orangutans, 95% for bonobos and 94.4% for gorillas. In a 2020 study, hand-raised ravens (eight started, seven finished) sat a 15-task battery adapted from the one used with apes: similar on quantities, theory of mind and social learning, slightly lower on causality and communication, and lower on spatial memory. The authors warned against generalising, and the original battery compared apes with 2.5-year-old children, which is a different yardstick from the 7-year-old headline. Verbal versus non-verbal IQ scores shows why a task-based, non-verbal measure is the closest thing to a fair test for any species.

Not the bird: Raven’s Progressive Matrices

Searching for “raven IQ” also returns a different Raven. Raven’s Progressive Matrices is a non-verbal reasoning test devised in the 1930s by the British psychologist John C. Raven, in which the test taker picks the piece that completes a pattern. It has nothing to do with the bird, and it is one of the most widely used measures of abstract reasoning in people. Its scoring is covered in Raven’s Progressive Matrices scores explained, and the pattern-completion format is the one children meet in the kids IQ tests.

Quick answers

What is the IQ of a crow?

There is none. IQ is a human-normed score. Experiments give task results, such as 76.3% correct at choosing water over sand, not a single number.

Are crows as smart as a 7-year-old?

On one narrow set of water-displacement puzzles, comparable to 5-to-7-year-olds, according to the study that started the claim. On two of six puzzles the same crows were at chance, and the comparison says nothing about language or schooling.

Can crows count?

Approximately. In a 2024 Science study three crows produced one to four calls to match a numeral or a sound cue. That shows control over the number of their own calls, not exact counting or arithmetic.

Do crows remember faces?

Yes. Wild American crows kept responding to the face of a person who trapped them for at least 2.7 years in the 2010 experiment. Claims of far longer grudges come from press coverage rather than that peer-reviewed figure.

Do crows hold funerals?

Not in the sense of mourning. Crows gather around dead crows, and research from the University of Washington found they use the scene to learn what is dangerous.

What is the smartest bird?

Corvids and parrots top the comparative studies and have the densest forebrain neuron counts, but no ranking exists across all species and tasks.

Are crows as smart as humans?

No head-to-head comparison exists. On one narrow set of puzzles crows match children of 5 to 7, and in tool making and planning they rival apes, but they have no language, schooling or written culture, and each result belongs to a small group of birds. “As smart” depends on which skill is meant.

Are ravens smarter than humans?

No. Ravens are among the strongest planners in animal studies, and the results are striking for a bird, but they cover specific tasks. Nothing in the research ranks ravens above people on any broad measure of intelligence.

Can crows recognise themselves in a mirror?

The best-known corvid result is for magpies, which belong to the crow family. In 2008 Prior, Schwarz and Güntürkün reported that some magpies behaved in front of a mirror as if testing behavioural contingencies and, given a mark, showed spontaneous mark-directed behaviour, which they called the first evidence of mirror self-recognition in a non-mammalian species (Prior and colleagues, 2008). The sources used in this article do not report a mirror result for crows, so the finding belongs to magpies.

The bottom line

Crows and ravens are impressive, but the question “what is a crow’s IQ” has no answer, because IQ is a comparison with human norms. The real picture is a profile: expert tool users, planners and face-readers that match a young child on some causal puzzles and fail others. The same lesson holds for people, where what an IQ of 135 means depends entirely on the group that the score is measured against.

Sources

• Jelbert et al. (2014), PLOS ONE: using the Aesop’s fable paradigm to investigate causal understanding of water displacement by New Caledonian crows.
• Cheke, Loissel and Clayton (2012), PLOS ONE: how do children solve Aesop’s fable?
• Weir, Chappell and Kacelnik (2002), Science: shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows.
• Kabadayi and Osvath (2017), Science: ravens parallel great apes in flexible planning for tool-use and bartering.
• Liao, Brecht, Veit and Nieder (2024), Science: crows “count” the number of self-generated vocalizations.
• Smirnova, Zorina, Obozova and Wasserman (2015), Current Biology: crows spontaneously exhibit analogical reasoning.
• Olkowicz et al. (2016), PNAS: birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain.
• Emery and Clayton (2004), Science: the mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes.
• Swift and Marzluff (2015), Animal Behaviour: wild American crows gather around their dead to learn about danger.
• Nieder, A., Wagener, L. and Rinnert, P. (2020): A neural correlate of sensory consciousness in a corvid bird, Science, 369, 1626-1629.
• Prior, H., Schwarz, A. and Güntürkün, O. (2008): Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition, PLoS Biology, 6, e202.